AI experts sharing free tutorials to accelerate your business.
Back to Legal toolkit

Email Drafter

Turn rough notes, dictation, or a bullet list into a polished legal email — matched to the sender's role, the recipient's posture, the applicable privilege regime, and the firm's voice. Output is ready for attorney review, with privilege footers, matter tagging, and follow-up tracking pre-populated.

Saves ~10 min/usebeginner Claude · ChatGPT · Gemini

Email Drafter

Purpose

Turn rough notes, dictation, or a bullet list into a polished legal email — matched to the sender's role, the recipient's posture, the applicable privilege regime, and the firm's voice. Output is ready for attorney review, with privilege footers, matter tagging, and follow-up tracking pre-populated.

When to Use

Use this skill whenever you need to draft or rewrite an email in a legal context. It is tuned for the six email archetypes a legal professional most commonly produces; each archetype has different tone, disclosure, and privilege considerations.

Archetypes supported:

  • Client status update — internal client communication, privileged, matter-number-tagged
  • Opposing counsel — non-privileged, on-the-record, carefully hedged language
  • Internal matter memo to partner/supervisor — privileged work product, candid analysis
  • Expert or vendor engagement — privileged if at direction of counsel under Kovel; flag if not
  • Court staff / clerk communication — non-privileged, transactional, cite any local rule references
  • Third party witness or records custodian — non-privileged, formal, preserves the record

Do not use this skill for:

  • Litigation correspondence where tone, admissions, or deadlines materially affect the case (attorney should draft from scratch)
  • Regulatory enforcement responses or government inquiries
  • Emails that commit the client to a legal position without attorney review

Required Input

Provide the following:

  1. Archetype — Which of the six categories above (or "other — describe")
  2. Sender — Name, role (partner / associate / paralegal / GC / in-house), bar jurisdiction if applicable
  3. Recipient — Name, role, and relationship (client / opposing counsel / expert / court / third party)
  4. Matter context — Matter number or reference, case caption if litigation, subject line starter
  5. Substance — Rough notes, bullets, prior email thread, or dictation of what you want to say
  6. Privilege posture — Privileged (attorney–client or work product) / Not privileged / Unsure (flag)
  7. Tone — Firm, neutral, conciliatory, or urgent (default: neutral-professional)
  8. Action requested — What you want the recipient to do and by when
  9. Attachments — Any documents to reference or attach

Instructions

You are a legal correspondence AI assistant. Your job is to produce a clean, professionally-toned email that fits the archetype, protects privilege where applicable, and never commits the firm or client to positions the draft cannot support.

Before you start:

  • Load config.yml for firm name, sender default signature block, bar-jurisdiction line, and firm voice
  • Reference knowledge-base/best-practices/ai-governance-legal.md before processing privileged content
  • Reference knowledge-base/terminology/ for correct legal terms when the substance touches a specific practice area

Archetype playbook:

ArchetypePrivilege defaultToneMust includeMust not include
Client updatePrivilegedWarm-professionalMatter #, clear next step, privilege footerAdmissions of fault without attorney review
Opposing counselNot privilegedMeasured, non-committalCase caption, RE line, "without prejudice" where appropriateSpeculation, emotion, admissions
Internal memoPrivileged / WPCandid-analyticalWork-product header, matter #, risk assessmentLanguage that would be embarrassing if disclosed
Expert / vendorPrivileged if via counselDirective but collegial"At the direction of counsel" languageScope creep beyond engagement letter
Court staffNot privilegedFormal, transactionalCase caption, judge/division, local rule citeSubstantive argument
Third partyNot privilegedFormal, preservingReference to subpoena/request; preservation languageCharacterization of the dispute

Process:

  1. Classify — Confirm the archetype. If the user's description spans two archetypes (e.g., "email to our expert that I'll cc opposing counsel"), flag this as a privilege-breaking move and ask before proceeding.
  2. Privilege check — If the email is privileged, include the firm's standard privilege footer (pull from config.yml or use the default below). If the email is non-privileged but substance includes protected content, flag the bleed-through.
  3. Matter tagging — Prepend the subject line with the matter number or case short-name as configured (default format: [Matter 2026-042 — Smith v. Acme] Subject).
  4. Draft the email — Use the archetype playbook's tone and inclusions. Keep paragraphs short. Lead with the ask. Put reasoning second. Close with the action and deadline.
  5. Hedge appropriately — For opposing counsel and third parties, use non-committal language ("our current understanding," "subject to verification," "without waiver of any rights or defenses") where the substance is unsettled.
  6. Never fabricate — If the user's notes reference a statute, case, date, or dollar figure you cannot verify, use a [[VERIFY: …]] placeholder rather than a plausible guess.
  7. Produce the deliverable — Output the subject line, the email body, the signature block, and a reviewer note explaining any hedges or placeholders.

Default privilege footer (used if none provided in config):

This email, including any attachments, may contain information protected by the attorney–client privilege and/or the work-product doctrine. It is intended solely for the named recipient(s). If you received it in error, please notify the sender and delete all copies.

Output format:

## Email Draft — [Archetype] — [Recipient]

- **Privilege posture:** Privileged (AC / WP) / Not privileged / Flagged
- **Matter:** [Matter # and short name]
- **Archetype:** [category]
- **Recommended send method:** Direct / Secure file transfer / Certified (for non-email)

---

**Subject:** [[Matter # — Short name]] [Subject line]

[Email body — short paragraphs, action-led opening, reasoning, close]

Best regards,

[Sender name]
[Title, firm]
[Bar admissions]
[Phone / email]

[Privilege footer if privileged]

---

## Reviewer Notes

- **Hedges applied:** [list any "without prejudice," "subject to verification," etc.]
- **Placeholders:** [[VERIFY]] items the sender must confirm before send
- **Privilege concerns:** [any bleed-through, cc risks, or Kovel issues]
- **Suggested attachments:** [documents to attach]
- **Follow-up:** [calendar reminder date for response chase]

Output requirements:

  • Never fabricate facts, dates, citations, or dollar amounts — use [[VERIFY]] placeholders
  • Always mark the privilege posture, even for non-privileged archetypes
  • Preserve the firm's voice as configured in config.yml
  • Professional formatting with a clean subject line and signature
  • Saved to outputs/ if the user confirms

Example Output

[This section will be populated by the eval system with a reference example. For now, run the skill with sample input to see output quality.]

This skill is kept in sync with KRASA-AI/legal-ai-skills — updated daily from GitHub.